
The computer itself has 32-bit Windows but a 64-bit processor. Also, people who know way more about computers than you said that my computer is very capable of running shaders. Like I said, I had a computer with lower intel graphics and a core i3 running shaders at 40-50FPS. Honestly, I know you're wrong so I'm not going to take your answer in. That rant came out longer the I meant it.

I could easily find you some 3000$ ASUS XPS models that are so unbalanced most games end up unplayable, despite supposedly better specs then what you have here. Just because something is expensive does not mean it's good. The most bizzare feature is 32bit Windows. A corporate/business "work" laptop, not a gaming machine.
#NOSTALGIA SHADERS MC SERIES#
The HP EliteBook 850 G1 series (all EliteBook models actually) is specifically meant to be a large but light multimedia unit. And apparently it's also one of the models that don't have an additional Radeon GPU. It has a U type CPU which are low power, low performance models. If you want a comment on your Laptop? The 1000$ price mostly comes from the huge high definition screen and expensive lightweight case materials. That the Intel HD chip is unable to process advances GLSL graphical instructions of the shader program. Incidentally that is what all these "can't load.
#NOSTALGIA SHADERS MC CODE#
But in many cases those claims include modifications to the shader code that strip out unsupported functions. Some claim to have gotten it working on SEUS. There's a reason why its description outright states that it won't work on Intel HD or Macs (Apple's shenanigans with OpenGL standards is another can of worms). Though frankly it's a bit surprising, as your CPU is severely underpowered for Minecraft.īut Intel HD chips outright lack the raw power and, in many cases basic support for necessary OpenGL features, to run high end shaders well, or at all.

That's mostly a function of the CPU performance (characteristic of Java), so as long as the GPU isn't outright bottlenecking you (as some older Intels can) you can easily run at 200 FPS. I never said you can't get good FPS in Vanilla.

Their DirectX support is decent, helped by the fact they supposedly outright bribe game devs to put in special hacks making games work better on Intel HD then they should. I strongly suspect their hardware may be outright not fully physically compatible with the standard. Some 5th gen or newer might have some actual horsepower behind them that rivals cheap dedicated cards, but get bogged by Intel's horrible drivers. Honestly? Yes, all Intel iGPUs are pretty bad at anything requiring strict OpenGL support.
